The availability of highly effective antiretroviral therapy in the mid-1990s transformed HIV from a fatal infection to a manageable, chronic disease. Persons with HIV who take modern combination antiretroviral therapy and maintain virologic suppression significantly reduce their HIV-associated morbidity and mortality,[1,2,3] and do not transmit HIV to others.[4,5,6] The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved medications in six different classes to treat HIV infection: entry inhibitors, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and capsid inhibitors(Figure 1).[7,8] This Topic Review will summarize the mechanism of action of antiretroviral medications, indications for antiretroviral therapy, and recommended antiretroviral regimens for treatment-naïve individuals. Separate Topic Reviews will address other issues related to antiretroviral therapy, including adverse effects, drug interactions, simplifying or switching therapy, assessment of drug resistance, and management of virologic failure. In addition, detailed information about each antiretroviral medication and for all fixed-dose combinations is available in the Antiretroviral Medication section of this website.
- Module 3 Overview
Antiretroviral Therapy - 0%Lesson 1
Antiretroviral Medications and Initial TherapyActivities- 0%Lesson 2
Adverse Effects of Antiretroviral MedicationsActivities- 0%Lesson 3
Drug Interactions with Antiretroviral MedicationsLesson 1. Antiretroviral Medications and Initial Therapy
Learning Objective Performance Indicators
- List the major classes of antiretroviral medications
- Explain the mechanism of action with each class of antiretroviral medications
- Summarize evidence supporting antiretroviral treatment of all persons with HIV
- Describe recommended antiretroviral regimens for treatment-naïve individuals and discuss factors to consider when selecting an initial regimen
- Discuss recommended laboratory studies to obtain at baseline and while monitoring response to therapy
Last Updated: October 8th, 2024Authors:David H. Spach, MD,David H. Spach, MD
Professor of Medicine
Division of Allergy & Infectious Diseases
University of WashingtonDisclosures: NoneBrian R. Wood, MDBrian R. Wood, MD
Professor of Medicine
Division of Allergy & Infectious Diseases
University of WashingtonDisclosures: NoneReviewer:Jehan Z. Budak, MDJehan Z. Budak, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Division of Allergy & Infectious Diseases
University of WashingtonDisclosures: NoneTable of Contents- Antiretroviral Medications and Initial Therapy
- Background
- HIV Life Cycle and Antiretroviral Drug Targets
- When to Initiate Antiretroviral Therapy
- Antiretroviral Regimens for Initial Therapy
- Choosing a Specific Antiretroviral Regimen
- Monitoring Response to Antiretroviral Therapy
- Poor CD4 Response to Antiretroviral Therapy
- Discontinuation or Treatment Interruption
- Summary Points
- Citations
- Additional References
- Figures
- Tables
Background
HIV Life Cycle and Antiretroviral Drug Targets
Understanding the basic HIV life cycle is the foundation for understanding the mechanism of action of the different classes of antiretroviral medications. The following discussion will focus on key HIV enzymes and relevant steps in the HIV life cycle related to HIV antiretroviral therapy. The Howard Hughes Medical Institute has produced an excellent HIV Life Cycle video (below) that summarizes the key steps in the HIV life cycle.
HIV Entry and Entry Inhibitors
HIV Envelope
The initial step in the HIV life cycle involves a complex interaction between HIV envelope spikes and host surface proteins. The HIV envelope consists of two structural components: surface envelope glycoprotein (gp120) and transmembrane envelope glycoprotein (gp41) (Figure 2).[9] The surface of HIV is studded with approximately 14 envelope spikes, with each spike consisting of a trimer of three gp120 and gp41 subunits.[10,11] Both gp120 and gp41 play an essential role in HIV entry into the host cell.
- gp120: The gp120 subunit is the component of the envelope that interacts with the host receptors and coreceptors; these interactions involve the gp120 CD4 binding site on the outermost surface of gp120 and the more internal variable 3 (V3) region of gp120. The gp120 V3 region plays a major role in determining the coreceptor tropism of HIV.
- gp41: The gp41 subunit consists of three domains: the ectodomain (in the extracellular region), the transmembrane domain (spans the HIV membrane), and the cytoplasmic tail (inside the HIV membrane).[12,13,14] The gp41 ectodomain has several functional components that include the N-terminal hydrophobic region (functions as the fusion peptide), the N-terminal heptad repeat region 1 (HR1), and the heptad repeat region 2 (HR2). Prior to cell binding, the HIV gp41 exists in a conformation in which the gp41 is folded back on itself in an energy-loaded state.
HIV Entry
The HIV entry process involves a sequential and coordinated interaction between the virus and the host cell that includes three key steps: (1) attachment of HIV gp120 with the host CD4 receptor, (2) HIV gp120-host chemokine coreceptor binding, and (3) gp41-mediated fusion of HIV with the host surface membrane.[9,15]
- Attachment: After initial nonspecific interactions between HIV and the host cell, the HIV gp120 attaches to the host CD4 receptor, with binding occurring at the CD4 binding pocket on HIV gp120 and the extracellular domain 1 (D1) of the CD4 receptor.[16]
- Coreceptor Binding: Following the initial gp120-CD4 receptor attachment, the HIV gp120 undergoes rearrangement, with the formation of a bridging sheet and repositioning of the V3 loop. This rearrangement allows the HIV gp120 V3 loop to interact with a host chemokine coreceptor (CC)—either the CCR5 or CXCR4 coreceptor (Figure 4). The HIV coreceptor binding (CCR5 or CXCR4) depends on the HIV subtype (R5 or X4), which is determined primarily by the HIV gp120 V3 region.
- Fusion: The HIV gp120-coreceptor interaction is believed to activate the gp41 fusion machinery, which triggers the unfolding of the gp41, with the insertion of the distal end of gp41 (gp41 fusion peptide) into the host cell membrane.[9,16] Next, the three gp41 subunits undergo a hairpin-like fold, resulting in the formation of a six-bundle helix central coil in which the HR1 and HR2 domains mesh along a series of grooves. In the process of forming this hairpin-like coiled bundle, the HIV and host membranes are pulled toward each other, generating the necessary momentum for the formation of a fusion pore and HIV-host cell membrane fusion.[9,16]
HIV Entry Inhibitors
The FDA-approved HIV entry inhibitors include four subclasses: (1) CD4 attachment inhibitors; (2) CD4 postattachment inhibitors, (3) CCR5 coreceptor antagonists, and (4) fusion inhibitors.[17,18] Note that the CD4 attachment inhibitor and the fusion inhibitor bind directly to HIV, whereas the postattachment inhibitor and the CCR5 coreceptor bind human cell surface receptors.(Figure 5)
- Attachment Inhibitor: The early interaction of HIV with the host CD4 cell involves binding of the HIV gp120 envelope protein with the host CD4 receptor. The attachment inhibitor fostemsavir is an oral prodrug that is hydrolyzed to the active form temsavir, which binds to the HIV gp120 envelope adjacent to the gp120-CD4 binding site.[19,20] The binding of temsavir prevents the gp120 conformational change required for normal attachment to the CD4 receptor.[19]
- Postattachment Inhibitor: The initial attachment of HIV to the CD4 cell occurs between the domain 1 region of the host CD4 receptor and the HIV gp120 binding site. The humanized monoclonal antibody ibalizumab binds to the domain 2 region of the host CD4 receptor, and, through steric hindrance, prevents the normal structural shifts that occur in gp120 that result in gp120-coreceptor binding; the net effect of ibalizumab is the prevention of viral entry.[21,22] Ibalizumab acts at a step following the initial attachment of CD4 domain 1 to HIV gp120, so it is referred to as a postattachment inhibitor. It is important to note that ibalizumab does not interfere with CD4-mediated immune function since it does not interfere with CD4 binding of MCH class II molecules, which occurs at the CD4 domain 1 region. Ibalizumab is available only as an intravenous infusion.
- CCR5 Receptor Antagonists: The appropriate use of CCR5 antagonists depends on knowledge of the person’s HIV subtype. There are three HIV subtypes related to the host coreceptor binding: R5 HIV (binds only to the CCR5 coreceptor); X4 HIV (binds only to the CXCR4 coreceptor); dual-tropic HIV (binds to either the CCR5 or CXCR4 coreceptor).[23,24] Individuals with a mixture of R5 HIV and X4 HIV have mixed-tropic HIV. The CCR5 antagonists bind to the CCR5 coreceptor, causing a conformational change in the coreceptor that prevents HIV gp120 from binding to the CCR5 coreceptor.[23,25] The CCR5 antagonists do not effectively block the entry of X4, dual-tropic, or mixed-tropic HIV. The drug maraviroc is the only FDA-approved CCR5 antagonist, and it is recommended for use in antiretroviral treatment-experienced individuals only if they have documented R5 HIV. Thus, prior to starting maraviroc, an HIV coreceptor tropism assay must be performed; these assay reports provide information on the presence of R5, X4, and dual/mixed (the reports do not differentiate between dual (R5/X4) and mixed (R5 and X4) isolates).[23,25,26] There are different options for checking a tropism assay; a phenotypic type of test is preferred over a genotypic type and a specific type of tropism assay must be requested if an individual has a suppressed HIV RNA (viral load).
- Fusion Inhibitor: In the normal fusion process, the HIV gp41 heptad repeat region 2 folds back on the heptad repeat region 1, in essence zipping up the gp41. This process pulls the HIV and host membranes together and results in the fusion of the viral and host membranes. The fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide is a 36-amino-acid synthetic peptide that corresponds to a 36-amino-acid segment in the HIV gp41 heptad repeat region 2; the enfuvirtide peptide binds to the heptad repeat region 1 of gp41, thus preventing the normal interaction and folding of the gp41 heptad repeat regions 1 and 2.[24,27,28] Enfuvirtide is the only FDA-approved fusion inhibitor. Enfuvirtide delivery is via subcutaneous injection.
Reverse Transcription and Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
HIV Reverse Transcriptase
The HIV reverse transcriptase enzyme catalyzes the critical HIV reverse transcription process. This enzyme is a heterodimer consisting of the p66 and p51 subunits; the p66 and p51 subunits are 560 and 440 amino acids in length, respectively, with the 440 amino acids of p51 overlapping with the first 440 amino acids of the p66 subunit (Figure 6).[29,30] The p66 subunit, which primarily has a catalytic role, consists of the polymerase and RNase H domains. Conceptually, the polymerase domain is structurally analogous to a human right hand, with specific regions corresponding to fingers, palm, and thumb.[30] The p51 subunit has a structural role, and is very closely related, but not identical to, the polymerase domain of the p66 subunit. Each HIV-1 virion contains approximately 50 reverse transcriptase enzymes.[29]
Reverse Transcription
The reverse transcription of HIV is a multistep process that results in a copy of linear, double-stranded HIV DNA being generated from single-stranded HIV RNA.[29,31] Each HIV-1 virion contains two copies of plus-stranded genomic RNA. Conceptually, the key steps in reverse transcription are the conversion of single-stranded HIV RNA to single-stranded HIV DNA, followed by digestion of the HIV RNA, and finishing with the formation of double-stranded HIV DNA from the single-stranded HIV DNA. The HIV reverse transcriptase enzyme plays a central role during reverse transcription and the enzymatic activities that occur involve the polymerase and RNase H active sites, which are both located in the p66 subunit. During this process, the HIV reverse transcriptase polymerase domain functions to add host nucleotides to the expanding strand of DNA, whereas the RNase H digests unwanted fragments of HIV RNA and HIV DNA. During this process of DNA synthesis, the HIV reverse transcriptase incorporates host nucleotides into the elongating primer strand, which forms opposite to the HIV template strand (Figure 7).[29]
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
The HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors include two classes of antiretroviral medications: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). Mechanistically, the fundamental difference between these classes is that the NRTIs act as host nucleotide decoys and cause termination of the elongating HIV DNA chain, whereas the NNRTIs bind directly to the HIV reverse transcriptase enzyme and inhibit the function of the enzyme.
- Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: The NRTIs require intracellular phosphorylation to obtain an active state. Once triphosphorylated, the NRTIs mimic human nucleotides and can be interchangeably taken up by reverse transcriptase.[30,32,33,34] Unlike human nucleotides, NRTI medications do not have a 3'-hydroxyl group, and additional nucleotides cannot be added to the NRTI drug; hence, they are called chain terminators (Figure 8).[30,32]
- Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: The NNRTIs bind to a hydrophobic pocket in the p66 subunit, which is close to the active polymerase site (Figure 9).[35,36] Binding of the NNRTI causes hyperextension of the reverse transcriptase “thumb” region, which causes a conformational change in this polymerase domain, thereby blocking the process of DNA polymerization, a critical step in HIV reverse transcription.[35,37] The NNRTI hydrophobic binding pocket region is predominantly lined by amino acid codons 98 to 108 and 179 to 190.[38]
HIV Integration and Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors
HIV Integrase
The HIV integrase enzyme is a 288-amino-acid protein that consists of three distinct structural domains: the amino (N)-terminal domain, the catalytic core domain, and the carboxy (C)-terminal domain; the catalytic core domain contains a trio of amino acids that coordinate binding with a divalent metal cofactor (either Mg2+ or Mn2+) and this region forms the active catalytic site (Figure 10).[39,40,41]. The HIV integrase enzyme can exist in the form of a monomer, dimer, tetramer, and possibly higher-order forms, such as octamers. Each HIV-1 virion has an estimated 40 to 100 integrase enzymes.[41]
HIV Integration
For replication, retroviruses must integrate the linear, double-stranded HIV DNA formed by reverse transcription into the host DNA. The integration of HIV DNA into host DNA is a multistep process, and the HIV enzyme integrase performs two key catalytic reactions: 3’ processing of the HIV DNA and strand transfer of the HIV DNA into the host DNA.[40,41,42] Initially, the HIV integrase (most likely in the dimer form) binds to each end of the newly formed HIV DNA as part of an intracellular nucleoprotein particle known as the preintegration complex (Figure 11).[40] The DNA-bound integrase removes two nucleotides on the 3’-ends of the DNA, forming sticky ends that are capable of inserting into the host DNA.[42] The preintegration complex, which is located within the HIV capsid core, then migrates into the nucleus of the host cell through a nuclear pore complex (facilitated by capsid interaction with certain host cell proteins). Inside the nucleus, the preintegration complex is released when the capsid core disassembles. At this point, the host protein lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF)/p75 binds to the preintegration complex and the host DNA, serving as a tethering protein (or bridge) between the preintegration complex and the host DNA.[34,40] Next, the strand transfer reaction occurs when the integrase enzyme catalyzes the HIV DNA 3’-hydroxyl group attack on the host DNA, and the HIV DNA is then inserted into the host DNA. In the final step, cellular enzymes perform DNA gap repair, which smooths over the HIV-host DNA junctions.[42]
Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors
Multiple potential sites of inhibition exist in the HIV integration process. The currently available HIV integrase inhibitors block the integrase strand transfer step and are thus referred to as integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) [43,44]. The INSTIs bind to the active site of the HIV integrase enzyme.[45] Specifically, the diketo acid group of the INSTIs binds to the magnesium ions located in the active site of HIV integrase, thereby inhibiting the active site (Figure 12).[40] In addition, upon binding to the magnesium ions, the INSTIs displace the HIV DNA 3'-hydroxyl ends, which interrupts the integration process since the 3’-hydroxyl ends are the critical nucleophiles during the transfer of the strand of HIV DNA into the host DNA.[45] By these mechanisms, binding of the INSTI to the integrase enzyme prevents the HIV complex from integrating into the host DNA. When the HIV integration process is blocked, the HIV DNA becomes a substrate for host repair enzymes that subsequently convert the HIV DNA complex into byproduct 2-long terminal repeat (2-LTR) circles.[42]
HIV Protein Processing and HIV Protease inhibitors
HIV Protease
The HIV protease enzyme is a 99-amino-acid dimer made up of two identical subunits (Figure 13). This enzyme has a key role in the post-transcriptional processing of the Gag (Pr55) and Gag-Pol (Pr160) polyproteins.[46] The HIV protease has three major conformational forms: open, semi-open, and closed. The protease enzyme has an active site near the center of the heterodimer, and the active site includes two opposed aspartic acid (Asp) residues. Movement from the open to closed form causes the protease flap ends to overlap, which functionally acts as molecular scissors.
Polyprotein Processing and Maturation
Protease-related polyprotein processing occurs in a consistent sequential pattern. The Gag polyprotein contains four structural proteins: matrix (p17), capsid (p24), nucleocapsid (p7), and p6 proteins. In addition, two spacer peptides (p2 and p1) are part of Gag. During approximately 5 to 10% of the Gag translation events, a ribosomal frameshift occurs that results in translation of the Gag-Pol polyprotein.[47] The Gag-Pol polyprotein includes the same structural Gag proteins, with the addition of the Pol functional enzymes (protease, reverse transcriptase, and integrase). Each virion contains approximately 5,000 Gag polyproteins.[48] The HIV protease initially catalyzes its own release from the Gag-Pol polyprotein strand. Once the HIV protease is untethered, it processes both the Gag-Pol and the Gag polyproteins. The HIV protease polyprotein processing of the Gag protein occurs in a predictable sequential cascade (Figure 14).[47,49,50] The timing of the polyprotein processing occurs late in the HIV replication cycle, typically during and shortly after the virus is released from the host cell. The processing of the Gag and Gag-Pol polyproteins results in the release of the matrix, capsid, nucleocapsid, p6, protease, reverse transcriptase, and integrase proteins.[49] The HIV protease enzyme is not involved in the processing of the gp160 envelope protein, which is the precursor glycoprotein for the gp120 and gp41 envelope glycoproteins.
Protease Inhibitors
The HIV protease inhibitors are structurally complex molecules that bind to the active site of HIV protease and inhibit the protease enzyme activity (Figure 15).[46,47] The HIV protease inhibitors disrupt the normal Gag and Gag-Pol polyprotein processing, causing the arrest of the normal maturation process, which thereby prevents infection of new cells. The protease inhibitors do not have an impact on cells already infected with HIV (those with proviral DNA integrated into the host DNA).
HIV Capsid and Capsid Inhibitors
HIV Capsid
The cone-shaped HIV capsid—also called the capsid core or the core—encases the viral genome and enzymes necessary for reverse transcription—reverse transcriptase and integrase.[51,52] The HIV core is a conical, hollow shell composed of the HIV p24 proteins and these proteins are also referred to as capsid proteins (CA); the capsid protein, which is derived from the HIV Gag polyprotein, has two domains, a 150-amino acid N-terminal domain and an 80-amino acid C-terminal domain (Figure 16). The capsid proteins self-assemble, forming hexamer and pentamer rings; each mature HIV capsid core consists of approximately 200 capsid hexamers and exactly 12 capsid pentamers.[52]
Capsid Assembly and Disassembly
The capsid is crucial for several stages of the HIV life cycle. After HIV entry into the CD4 host cell, the HIV capsid core enters the cytoplasm and subsequently migrates to the nucleus along the host cell microtubule network.[51,53] After reaching the nuclear pore, the core interacts with host cellular proteins to mediate transport through the nuclear pore complex into the nucleus.[53] During the migration to and through the nuclear pore, the capsid core shields the viral genome and facilitates the reverse transcription process, which takes place inside the core.[51] Beginning late in the transport and late in the reverse transcription process, the capsid core begins to disassemble (or uncoat) and this process is eventually completed after the capsid core is transported inside the nucleus. The disassembled capsid core releases the reverse-transcribed viral genome (which is now double-stranded DNA) for integration into the host DNA.[53] Later in the viral life cycle, the Gag and Gag-Pol polyproteins are cleaved, releasing individual capsid (p24) protein monomers, which assemble into hexamers and pentamers, and these larger subunits assemble into the cone-like capsid core in a process referred to as capsid assembly.[53] This latter stage of the life cycle is called viral maturation.[53] Thus, the HIV capsid plays a critical role in multiple steps in the HIV life cycle.
HIV Capsid Inhibitors
The HIV capsid inhibitors are a unique class of antiretroviral medication; these medications interfere with the structure and function of the HIV capsid and thereby block multiple steps in the HIV lifecycle pathway (Figure 17).[54] Lenacapavir is the only drug in this class currently approved by the FDA. Lenacapavir binds within a pocket between the capsid subunits of two different capsid proteins, thereby reducing the flexibility of the interhexamer connections.[54,55,56] Lenacapavir inhibits viral replication at three steps in the HIV life cycle: (1) it disrupts the normal transport of the capsid core through the nuclear pore complex, (2) it prevents the uncoating or disassembly of the capsid, and (3) it interferes with reassembly of the capsid core as part of the HIV maturation process.[54,57]
When to Initiate Antiretroviral Therapy
Recommendations for Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy
The Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines recommend initiation of antiretroviral therapy for all persons with HIV to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with HIV infection and to prevent HIV transmission to others (Table 1).[58] In addition, antiretroviral therapy should be started immediately, or as soon as possible, after the HIV diagnosis.[58]
Data for Clinical Benefit of Antiretroviral Therapy
The Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines recommendation to initiate antiretroviral therapy in all persons with HIV to reduce morbidity and mortality is based on multiple cohort studies and clinical trials, as outlined below. Collectively, these trials have shown a clear benefit of starting antiretroviral therapy earlier in the course of HIV disease progression.[1,2,59,60,61,62]
Data for Antiretroviral Therapy Reducing HIV Transmission
The recommendation in the Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines regarding the use of antiretroviral therapy to prevent HIV transmission is based on multiple studies that indicate antiretroviral therapy dramatically lowers the risk of perinatal transmission of HIV and sexual transmission of HIV.[4,63,64,65] These studies are outlined in detail in the Module 5 lesson Preventing HIV Transmission in Persons with HIV.
Recommendations for Elite and Viremic Controllers
Definition of Elite and Viremic Controllers
A small percentage of persons naturally control their HIV without medications and are considered "elite controllers" of HIV. These individuals have a unique immunologic response to HIV that results in persistent control of plasma HIV RNA to levels consistently below the limit of quantitation. These individuals also usually maintain long-term control of CD4 cell count levels above 500 cells/mm3.[66] Similarly, a larger but still small subset of individuals with HIV, referred to as "viremic controllers," have the ability to naturally maintain plasma HIV RNA at very low, but not undetectable, levels.[66] Viremic controllers also usually have high CD4 cell counts but typically have less stable and lower CD4 cell counts than elite controllers.[67]
Management of Elite and Viremic Controllers
The optimal antiretroviral management of elite controllers and viremic controllers has generated controversy, since without antiretroviral therapy, these individuals naturally control HIV RNA levels and theoretically would pose minimal risk of transmitting HIV to others. These individuals, however, may still have an increased risk of non-AIDS-related morbidity from immune activation and a significant proportion will eventually lose their immunologic control of HIV and experience disease progression.[66,68,69] The Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines make the following key recommendations for elite controllers:[58]
- Antiretroviral therapy is clearly recommended for elite controllers if they have evidence of HIV disease progression.
- The clinical benefit of antiretroviral therapy in elite controllers who do not have HIV disease progression remains uncertain.
- Elite controllers have increased immune activation and markers for increased risk of atherosclerosis.
- There is a theoretical benefit of giving antiretroviral therapy to elite controllers to reduce immune activation and potential non-AIDS morbidity.
- If antiretroviral therapy is not given to elite controllers, close follow-up should occur since some of these individuals lose their natural control of HIV.
Antiretroviral Regimens for Initial Therapy
The Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines stratify antiretroviral regimens for initial therapy as (1) Recommended Initial Regimens for Most People with HIV or (2) Other Initial Antiretroviral Regimens for Certain Clinical Scenarios. The category Recommended Initial Regimens for Most People with HIV is further subdivided into (1) recommendations for people who do not have a history of receiving long-acting cabotegravir as HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and (2) recommendations for people diagnosed with HIV who have a history of using long-acting cabotegravir for PrEP.[70] Choosing an initial antiretroviral regimen depends on multiple factors, including medical comorbidities, potential drug interactions, insurance coverage, and patient preferences (pill burden, frequency of dosing, and food requirements).
Recommended Initial Regimens for Most People with HIV
The Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines Recommended Initial Regimens for Most People with HIV treatment options depend on whether the individual has previously received long-acting injectable cabotegravir.[70]
Table 2. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents with HIVRecommended Initial Regimens for Most People with HIV
Recommended regimens are those with demonstrated durable virologic efficacy, favorable tolerability and toxicity profiles, and ease of use. Choice of antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy should be guided by recommendations from the Perinatal Guidelines. For people who do NOT have a history of long-acting cabotegravir use as HIV PrEP, the following regimens are recommended: INSTI + 2 NRTIs:
- Bictegravir-tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine (AI)
- Dolutegravir plus (tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir DF)a plus (emtricitabine or lamivudine) (AI)
INSTI + 1 NRTI
- Dolutegravir-lamivudine (AI)—except for individuals with HIV RNA >500,000 copies/mL, HBV coinfection, or when antiretroviral therapy is to be started before the results of HIV genotypic resistance testing for reverse transcriptase or HBV testing are available
For people with HIV and a history of using long-acting cabotegravir as HIV PrEP, integrase genotypic drug resistance testing should be done before the start of antiretroviral therapy. If treatment is begun prior to the results of genotypic testing, the following regimen is recommended: Boosted PI + 2 NRTIs:
- Darunavir (boosted with cobicistat or ritonavir) plus (tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir DF)a plus (emtricitabine or lamivudine)—pending the results of the genotype test (AIII).
Abbreviations: INSTI = integrase strand transfer inhibitor; NRTI = nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor
aTenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir DF are two forms of tenofovir approved by the FDA. Tenofovir alafenamide has fewer bone and kidney toxicities than tenofovir DF, whereas tenofovir DF is associated with lower lipid levels. Safety, cost, and access are among the factors to consider when choosing between these drugs.Rating of Recommendations: A = Strong; B = Moderate; C = Weak
Rating of Evidence: I = Data from randomized controlled trials; II = Data from well-designed nonrandomized trials, observational cohort studies with long-term clinical outcomes, relative bioavailability/bioequivalence studies, or regimen comparisons from randomized switch studies; III = Expert opinionSource:- Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. What to start: initial combination regimens for people with HIV. September 12, 2024. [HIV.gov]
- For People Who Have Not Received Long-Acting Cabotegravir for PrEP: The Recommended Initial Regimens for Most People with HIV, in the setting of no history of receiving long-acting cabotegravir as HIV PrEP prior to HIV diagnosis, include an INSTI anchor drug in combination with at least one NRTI.[49,70] All of these regimens can be dosed once daily. Note that dolutegravir-lamivudine should not be used as initial therapy in the following three situations: (1) the baseline HIV RNA level is greater than 500,000 copies/mL, (2) the person undergoing treatment has chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or the HBV status is unknown, or (3) results from HIV genotypic resistance testing or hepatitis B serology are not available at the time antiretroviral therapy is planned to start.[70] The other recommended regimens can be initiated prior to availability of genotype resistance test results.
- For People Who Received Long-Acting Cabotegravir for PrEP: For individuals diagnosed with HIV who have a history of receiving long-acting cabotegravir for HIV PrEP, the recommended initial antiretroviral therapy must take into account potential integrase resistance. The reason for this concern is that injectable cabotegravir, an INSTI, has an extremely long half-life and can remain at quantifiable levels in plasma for months to years (up to 4 years for some individuals). Thus, a person who acquires HIV after stopping long-acting cabotegravir may have levels of cabotegravir that are inadequate for the prevention of HIV acquisition, but may be high enough to stimulate the development of integrase resistance. Therefore, in persons with prior injectable cabotegravir use, the guidelines recommend obtaining genotypic HIV drug resistance testing, including testing for integrase resistance, and initiating therapy with boosted darunavir (darunavir-cobicistat or darunavir plus ritonavir) with two NRTIs—tenofovir alafenamide (or tenofovir DF) plus emtricitabine (or lamivudine)—while awaiting the results. If a baseline integrase genotype does not show evidence of INSTI resistance, one can then change the boosted darunavir to a recommended INSTI, such as dolutegravir or bictegravir.
Recommended Initial Regimens in Certain Clinical Situations
Multiple antiretroviral regimens are available that are effective and tolerable but are not generally preferred due to certain disadvantages or less efficacy data, as compared to the regimens listed above. The Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines denotes this category as Other Initial Antiretroviral Regimens for Certain Clinical Scenarios (Table 3).[70]
Special Considerations for Persons of Childbearing Potential
The Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines have specific recommendations for individuals trying to conceive or who are sexually active and not using effective contraception and may become pregnant.[71,72] Based on updated data, dolutegravir is now considered a preferred option in persons of child-bearing age who may conceive.[71,72] In addition, for people who are pregnant, the Perinatal HIV Clinical Guidelines dolutegravir is now recommended as the preferred anchor drug in combination with a preferred dual NRTI backbone (abacavir-lamivudine, tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine, tenofovir DF-emtricitabine, or tenofovir DF-lamivudine).[71,72,73] Boosted darunavir is the preferred anchor drug for initial therapy if the pregnant person has exposure to long-acting cabotegravir.[72,73]Choosing a Specific Antiretroviral Regimen
Factors to Consider for Selecting an Initial Regimen
In clinical practice, a number of specific clinical scenarios exist that may warrant consideration to avoid or use certain regimens. The following summarizes the recommendations in the Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines.[74]
- Pretreatment HIV RNA Level: Rilpivirine-anchored regimens should not be used with pretreatment HIV RNA levels greater than 100,000 copies/mL due to higher rates of virologic failure. In addition, dolutegravir-lamivudine should not be used when the pretreatment HIV RNA level is greater than 500,000 copies/mL based on limited data.
- Pretreatment CD4 Cell Count: Higher rates of virologic failure have occurred with rilpivirine-anchored regimens when the pretreatment CD4 count is less than 200 cells/mm3.
- Treatment of HIV Before Drug Resistance Results Available: It is essential to use an antiretroviral regimen that has a high genetic barrier to resistance in the situation when treatment is initiated prior to availability of the HIV genotypic drug resistance test results. In general, NNRTI-based regimens should be avoided in this setting. The following regimens are recommended in this situation:
- Bictegravir-tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine
- Dolutegravir plus (tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir DF) plus (emtricitabine or lamivudine)
- Darunavir (boosted with ritonavir or cobicistat) plus (tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir DF) plus (emtricitabine or lamivudine)
- History of Prior Exposure to Long-Acting Cabotegravir: If an individual diagnosed with HIV has received long-acting cabotegravir in the past, results of an integrase genotype should be available prior to initiating an INSTI-based regimen. If initiating antiretroviral therapy prior to availability of integrase genotype results, the recommended ART option is boosted darunavir plus tenofovir alafenamide (or tenofovir DF) with emtricitabine (or lamivudine).
- Food Requirements: The NRTI backbone combinations of abacavir-lamivudine, tenofovir DF-emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine can be taken with or without food. The INSTI dolutegravir can be taken with or without food; the single-tablet regimens bictegravir-tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine, dolutegravir-abacavir-lamivudine, dolutegravir-lamivudine, and doravirine-tenofovir DF-lamivudine can also be taken with or without food. The following medications should be taken with food: rilpivirine, darunavir boosted with ritonavir, and darunavir boosted with cobicistat.
- Chronic Kidney Disease: For persons who have a pretreatment estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 mL/min, any regimen containing tenofovir DF should be avoided. If the eGFR is less than 30 mL/min, any regimen containing tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine should be avoided.
- Osteoporosis: In patients with known osteoporosis, tenofovir DF or any fixed-dose combination that contains tenofovir DF should be avoided.
- Mental Health Conditions or Dementia: Efavirenz, and possibly rilpivirine, have been associated with worsening of psychiatric symptoms, and consideration should be given to avoiding these medications in persons with a mental health disorder or dementia.
- Hyperlipidemia: The INSTIs bictegravir, dolutegravir, and raltegravir are considered lipid neutral. Tenofovir DF has a favorable impact on lipids. The following medications often cause dyslipidemia: ritonavir-boosted PIs, cobicistat-containing regimens, and efavirenz.
- Concern for Excess Weight Gain: Use of INSTIs, particularly dolutegravir plus tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine and bictegravir-tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine, have been associated with more weight gain after starting antiretroviral therapy as compared to older regimens, such as regimens that contain efavirenz or a boosted protease inhibitor as the anchor drug, or regimens that contain tenofovir DF as a component of the 2NRTI backbone. The mechanisms and long-term implications have not been confirmed, and the guidelines do not recommend altering the choice of an initial antiretroviral regimen based on this observation.
- Cardiac QTc Interval Prolongation: Since efavirenz, rilpivirine, and fostemsavir may prolong QTc, they should be avoided in persons taking other medications that may prolong QTc.
Choosing the Anchor Drug in an Initial ART Regimen
The choice of the third drug, commonly referred to as the anchor drug, to combine with an NRTI backbone for an initial antiretroviral regimen depends on clinical, pharmacologic, and patient-level factors. In the Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines, the Recommended Initial Regimens for Most People with HIV utilize the INSTI bictegravir or dolutegravir for the anchor drug (as long as the individual diagnosed with HIV has never received cabotegravir for HIV PrEP). The recommendation to use these two INSTIs as the anchor drug is based on high efficacy, high genetic barrier to resistance, low adverse effect profile, and minimal drug interactions.[70]
Choice of INSTI
In the Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines, two of the INSTIs (bictegravir and dolutegravir) are included as the anchor drug components of the Recommended Initial Regimens for Most People with HIV (assuming the patient has never received cabotegravir for HIV PrEP).[70] Note that bictegravir is available only as a fixed-dose combination with tenofovir alafenamide and emtricitabine. Study 1490, initial therapy with bictegravir-tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine showed similar virologic responses as dolutegravir plus tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine.[33] Bictegravir and dolutegravir have emerged as the most attractive INSTI-based options primarily because of their high genetic barrier to resistance, good tolerability, and minimal drug interactions.
Choice of PI
The Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines recommend two NRTIs plus boosted darunavir or as the only preferred protease inhibitor-based options.[70] For initial therapy, darunavir is dosed once daily (with food) and boosting can be achieved with either ritonavir or cobicistat.
Choice of NNRTI
Doravirine and rilpivirine are the NNRTI anchor drugs available in the category of Other Initial Antiretroviral Regimens for Certain Clinical Scenarios.[70] Rilpivirine should not be used in persons who have a current HIV RNA level greater than or equal to 100,000 copies/mL or a CD4 count less than or equal to 200 cells/mm3.[70,74] In addition, rilpivirine is contraindicated for individuals who are taking a proton pump inhibitor and must be taken with food.[70] Doravirine is well-tolerated, can be taken with or without food, and can be used in combination with proton pump inhibitors. Doravirine is available alone as a tablet or as a coformulated single-tablet three-drug regimen: doravirine-tenofovir DF-lamivudine.
Choosing the NRTI Backbone in an INitial Regimen
The Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines include three different dual NRTI backbone combinations: tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine, tenofovir DF-emtricitabine, and tenofovir DF-lamivudine.[70] Tenofovir DF can cause renal dysfunction and loss of bone mineral density; accordingly, tenofovir DF is not recommended for patients with renal disease or osteoporosis. Tenofovir alafenamide has a less favorable lipid profile than tenofovir DF.
Monitoring Response to Antiretroviral Therapy
After initiating antiretroviral therapy, it is essential to monitor the virologic and immunologic response to therapy. The following outlines recommendations in the Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines for monitoring HIV RNA levels and CD4 cell counts in persons on antiretroviral therapy.[75,76]
HIV RNA Monitoring
During the first 8 to 12 weeks after starting antiretroviral therapy, most individuals will achieve a reduction in HIV RNA levels to less than 50 copies/mL. For some individuals, particularly those with extremely high baseline HIV RNA levels, the time for virologic suppression may extend past 12 weeks. The important parameter is whether the HIV RNA levels continue to decline. In general, INSTI-based regimens cause a more rapid reduction in HIV RNA levels than NNRTI- or PI-based regimens.[77,78]
- Baseline: All individuals initiating antiretroviral therapy should have a baseline HIV RNA level.
- After Initiating Therapy: After starting antiretroviral therapy, an HIV RNA level should be obtained, preferably within 4 to 8 weeks. Subsequently, HIV RNA levels should be repeated every 4 to 8 weeks until the HIV RNA is suppressed to less than 50 copies/mL.
- After Virologic Suppression: Once HIV RNA levels are suppressed, the frequency of HIV RNA monitoring should extend to every 3 to 4 months.
- With Long-Term Virologic Suppression: For adherent individuals who have consistently suppressed HIV RNA for at least 1 year (and stable clinical and immunologic status), HIV RNA monitoring can be extended to 6-month intervals as long as there are no concerns for problems with adherence.
- After Antiretroviral Regimen Change: Following any change in the antiretroviral regimen, the HIV RNA level should be checked within 4 to 8 weeks, whether the medication change was for drug toxicity, regimen simplification, or another reason. This recommendation holds even when the person has virologic suppression at the time of change in the antiretroviral regimen.
- Virologic Breakthrough: In persons on antiretroviral therapy who have a virologic breakthrough, monitoring of HIV RNA levels should be adjusted as needed.
- Change in Clinical Status: If an individual has a change in clinical status or has to initiate therapy with chronic corticosteroids or chemotherapy, the HIV RNA levels should be checked every 3 months.
CD4 Cell Count Monitoring
Individuals who have suppressed HIV RNA levels on antiretroviral therapy typically have an increase in CD4 count of approximately 50 to 150 cells/mm3 after the first year, with subsequent average yearly increases of approximately 50 to 100 cells/mm3 until a steady state is attained.[79,80]
- Baseline: All persons starting on antiretroviral therapy should have a baseline CD4 cell count checked.
- After Initiating Therapy: A repeat CD4 cell count should be obtained 3 months after starting therapy.
- During First 2 Years After Initiating Therapy: During the first 2 years after starting antiretroviral therapy, CD4 count monitoring should occur every 3 months if the CD4 cell count is less than 300 cells/mm3 and every 6 months if the CD4 count is greater than 300 cells/mm3.
- With Long-Term Stable Virologic Suppression: After 2 years on antiretroviral therapy, the frequency of CD4 cell count monitoring for adherent patients with consistently suppressed HIV RNA levels should be determined by immune status:
- If the CD4 count is less than 300 cells/mm3, CD4 monitoring can be extended to 6-month intervals.
- If the CD4 count is consistently in the 300 to 500 cells/mm3 range, monitoring can be extended to 12-month intervals.
- If the CD4 count is consistently greater than 500 cells/mm3, monitoring should be considered optional.
- Change in Clinical Status: If an individual who is taking antiretroviral therapy has a change in clinical status or has to initiate therapy with chronic corticosteroids or chemotherapy, the CD4 cell count should be checked as clinically indicated.
Poor CD4 Response to Antiretroviral Therapy
After starting antiretroviral therapy, the virologic (viral load) response is the most important factor in predicting an overall successful treatment outcome. Virologic suppression is usually achieved by 3 to 6 months. The immunologic (CD4 cell) response is also important and is critical for determining the risk of opportunistic infections and other HIV-related complications. Typically, adults with HIV have a brisk increase in CD4 cells in the first 3 to 6 months after starting antiretroviral therapy, predominantly due to a release of memory CD4 cells trapped within lymphoid tissues.[81] In the second phase of CD4 recovery, there is a gradual increase in CD4 counts that continues for 3 to 6 years; this phase involves both naïve CD4 cells (from the thymus) and memory CD4 cells. In general, persons with lower nadir CD4 cell counts have a lower likelihood of having a high or near normal CD4 count upon recovery following years of antiretroviral therapy (Figure 18).[55,82,83] Approximately 15% of persons with HIV and advanced immunosuppression fail to recover their CD4 count at a level greater than 200 cells/mm3 despite virologic suppression.[84] These “discordant” virologic-immunologic responses can generate concern, especially since persistent low CD4 is associated with increased AIDS-related and non-AIDS-related morbidity and mortality.[31,85]
Factors Associated with Poor CD4 Recovery
Investigators have identified multiple factors associated with a poor CD4 count response to antiretroviral therapy: older age, pretreatment CD4 count less than 200 cells/mm3, hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection, HIV type 2 (HIV-2) coinfection, coexistence of other chronic medical conditions, and the use of antiretroviral regimens that contain certain medications, such as zidovudine or the combination of tenofovir DF and didanosine, which are almost never prescribed in the current HIV treatment era.[31,86] A meta-analysis of different antiretroviral regimens found that ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based regimens produced better CD4 cell responses than either unboosted protease inhibitor regimens or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens.[87] In addition, studies have shown greater CD4 count increases with raltegravir- and dolutegravir-based regimens than with efavirenz-based regimens.[78,88] Medications or chemotherapeutic agents that cause bone marrow suppression can significantly reduce the CD4 count, typically with a gradual return to normal after the medication is discontinued; these types of medications generally do not impact the CD4 percentage nearly as much as the absolute CD4 cell count.
Recommendations for Patients with Persistently Low CD4 Counts
For persons with HIV who have poor CD4 count recovery (CD4 count remains below 200 cells/mm3 despite suppressed HIV RNA levels for at least 2 years), the Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines do not recommend intensifying or switching the antiretroviral regimen.[31] It is important to evaluate whether the individual is taking any medications (not used to treat HIV) that suppress the bone marrow or whether they have clinical manifestations (pancytopenia, systemic symptoms) that may suggest a bone marrow infiltrative process. In addition, individuals who have persistently low CD4 counts should receive appropriate prophylaxis for opportunistic infections, if indicated. Two large randomized trials (ESPRIT and SILCATT) showed interleukin-2 given to patients with suboptimal CD4 cell count responses caused a significant increase in CD4 cell counts, but the increase was not associated with any clinical benefit (Figure 19).[89] Thus, use of interleukin-2 to boost CD4 cell counts is not recommended.
Discontinuation or Treatment Interruption
Temporary discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy may be necessary at certain times due to acute side effects, illness, surgery that prohibits oral intake, or unavailability of the antiretroviral medications; aside from these factors, persons with HIV should not interrupt antiretroviral therapy. Planned treatment interruptions, often referred to as strategic treatment interruptions, at one time were thought to be potentially beneficial to limit long-term antiretroviral therapy toxicity. Subsequently, discontinuation of therapy was shown to be detrimental to health outcomes.
Data Related to Strategic Treatment Interruptions
In the Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) trial, investigators randomly assigned patients with CD4 counts greater than 350 cells/mm3 to either continuous or episodic use of antiretroviral therapy (the episodic group waited until the CD4 count decreased to 250 cells/mm3 to start, then stopped when the count reached 350 cells/mm3, and reinitiated therapy if the CD4 count declined to less than 250 cells/mm3).[90] The investigators found that the episodic therapy group had a significantly increased risk of opportunistic infection or death (from any cause) when compared with the continuous therapy group. Analyses from this trial also showed that the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was higher for the group of participants who took antiretroviral therapy episodically, though the exact explanation for this increase was not confirmed.[91] Several other studies have shown that antiretroviral treatment interruption usually results in viral rebound, decreases in CD4 cell count, and, eventually, clinical progression.[92,93] Strategic treatment interruptions are not recommended.[94]
Recommendations
For patients who require short-term, temporary discontinuation of their antiretroviral regimen due to surgery or acute illness, or who make a planned interruption despite advice against interruption, the Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines provide specific recommendations for how to safely stop the medications, particularly for patients who are taking medications with significantly different half-lives.[94] In general, all medications should be stopped simultaneously and the duration of discontinuations should be minimized as much as possible. For individuals who cannot swallow oral pills (either temporarily or on a longer-term basis), resources are available for which antiretroviral agents can be administered as a liquid, which can be cruised, and which can be given as a parenteral formulation. Specific recommendations for stopping long-acting, injectable antiretroviral medications, such as intramuscular cabotegravir-rilpivirine or lenacapavir, also exist and can be found in the package insert or guidelines.
Summary Points
- Six classes of antiretroviral medications, which target specific points of intervention in the multistep HIV life cycle, have been developed for clinical use: (1) entry inhibitors, (2) NRTIs, (3) NNRTIs, (4) INSTIs, (5) PIs, and (6) capsid inhibitors.
- The Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines recommend initiation of antiretroviral therapy for all persons with HIV to reduce disease progression and prevent transmission; this recommendation reflects evidence from clinical trials and cohort studies that have shown the benefits of starting antiretroviral therapy early after acquiring HIV.
- In the Adult and Adolescent ART Guidelines, the Recommended Initial Regimens for Most People with HIV, in the absence of a history of long-acting cabotegravir for HIV PrEP, consists of an INSTI anchor drug plus a 2-drug NRTI backbone. The INSTI anchor drug for initial therapy is typically bictegravir or dolutegravir. Other effective regimen options are available for use in certain clinical situations.
- If a person is diagnosed with HIV while or after receiving long-acting cabotegravir for PrEP, an integrase genotype is indicated and should be performed prior to initiating INSTI-based antiretroviral therapy. If antiretroviral therapy is initiated prior to integrase genotype results, a boosted darunavir-based regimen should be prescribed.
- The choice of the initial antiretroviral regimen depends on multiple patient factors, including medical and mental health comorbidities, patient preferences, insurance coverage, drug interactions, and prior HIV PrEP usage.
- After the initiation of antiretroviral therapy, laboratory monitoring is important to determine the HIV RNA response to therapy, evaluate the CD4 count response, and to monitor for antiretroviral toxicity.
- Virologic response to antiretroviral therapy is the most important factor in predicting an overall successful treatment outcome, and most patients will achieve virologic suppression (HIV RNA below the lower level of detection of the assay) within 12 to 16 weeks.
- Typically, individuals with HIV have a brisk increase in CD4 cells in the first 3 to 6 months after starting antiretroviral therapy, followed by a more gradual increase over 3 to 6 years, although a small proportion of patients fail to recover their CD4 count at a level greater than 200 cells/mm3 despite sustained virologic suppression.
- Scheduled antiretroviral treatment interruption is not recommended since this practice has been linked to an increased risk of opportunistic infection and death.
Citations
- 1.INSIGHT START Study Group, Lundgren JD, Babiker AG, Gordin F, et al. Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy in Early Asymptomatic HIV Infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:795-807.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 2.Kitahata MM, Gange SJ, Abraham AG, et al. Effect of early versus deferred antiretroviral therapy for HIV on survival. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1815-26.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 3.Samji H, Cescon A, Hogg RS, et al. Closing the gap: increases in life expectancy among treated HIV-positive individuals in the United States and Canada. PLoS One. 2013;8:e81355.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 4.Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, et al. Antiretroviral Therapy for the Prevention of HIV-1 Transmission. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:830-9.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 5.McNairy ML, El-Sadr WM. Antiretroviral therapy for the prevention of HIV transmission: what will it take? Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:1003-11.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 6.Rodger AJ, Cambiano V, Bruun T, et al. Sexual Activity Without Condoms and Risk of HIV Transmission in Serodifferent Couples When the HIV-Positive Partner Is Using Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy. JAMA. 2016;316:171-81.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 7.Arts EJ, Hazuda DJ. HIV-1 antiretroviral drug therapy. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a007161.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 8.Gandhi M, Gandhi RT. Single-pill combination regimens for treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:248-59.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 9.Wilen CB, Tilton JC, Doms RW. HIV: cell binding and entry. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a006866.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 10.Schiller J, Chackerian B. Why HIV virions have low numbers of envelope spikes: implications for vaccine development. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004254.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 11.Zhu P, Liu J, Bess J Jr, et al. Distribution and three-dimensional structure of AIDS virus envelope spikes. Nature. 2006;441:847-52.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 12.Yi HA, Fochtman BC, Rizzo RC, Jacobs A. Inhibition of HIV Entry by Targeting the Envelope Transmembrane Subunit gp41. Curr HIV Res. 2016;14:283-94.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 13.Chan DC, Fass D, Berger JM, Kim PS. Core structure of gp41 from the HIV envelope glycoprotein. Cell. 1997;89:263-73.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 14.Montero M, van Houten NE, Wang X, Scott JK. The membrane-proximal external region of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope: dominant site of antibody neutralization and target for vaccine design. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008;72:54-84.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 15.Klasse PJ. The molecular basis of HIV entry. Cell Microbiol. 2012;14:1183-92.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 16.Pöhlmann S, Reeves JD. Cellular entry of HIV: Evaluation of therapeutic targets. Curr Pharm Des. 2006;12:1963-73.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 17.Haqqani AA, Tilton JC. Entry inhibitors and their use in the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Antiviral Res. 2013;98:158-70.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 18.Henrich TJ, Kuritzkes DR. HIV-1 entry inhibitors: recent development and clinical use. Curr Opin Virol. 2013;3:51-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 19.Cahn P, Fink V, Patterson P. Fostemsavir: a new CD4 attachment inhibitor. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2018;13:341-345.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 20.Kozal M, Aberg J, Pialoux G, et al. Fostemsavir in Adults with Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1 Infection. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1232-43.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 21.Bettiker RL, Koren DE, Jacobson JM. Ibalizumab. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2018;13:354-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 22.Iacob SA, Iacob DG. Ibalizumab Targeting CD4 Receptors, An Emerging Molecule in HIV Therapy. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2323.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 23.Esté JA, Telenti A. HIV entry inhibitors. Lancet. 2007;370:81-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 24.Kilby JM, Eron JJ. Novel therapies based on mechanisms of HIV-1 cell entry. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2228-38.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 25.Wilkin TJ, Gulick RM. CCR5 antagonism in HIV infection: current concepts and future opportunities. Annu Rev Med. 2012;63:81-93.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 26.Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Laboratory testing: co-receptor tropism assays. October 25, 2018.[HIV.gov] -
- 27.Tilton JC, Doms RW. Entry inhibitors in the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Antiviral Res. 2010;85:91-100.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 28.Cervia JS, Smith MA. Enfuvirtide (T-20): a novel human immunodeficiency virus type 1 fusion inhibitor. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:1102-6.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 29.Hu WS, Hughes SH. HIV-1 reverse transcription. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a006882.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 30.Sarafianos SG, Marchand B, Das K, et al. Structure and function of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: molecular mechanisms of polymerization and inhibition. J Mol Biol. 2009;385:693-713.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 31.Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Management of the treatment-experienced patient: poor CD4 cell recovery and persistent inflammation despite viral suppression. June 3, 2021.[HIV.gov] -
- 32.Deval J. Antimicrobial strategies: inhibition of viral polymerases by 3'-hydroxyl nucleosides. Drugs. 2009;69:151-66. [PubMed Abstract] -
- 33.Sax PE, Pozniak A, Montes ML, et al. Coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide, for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (GS-US-380-1490): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2073-82.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 34.Vandegraaff N, Engelman A. Molecular mechanisms of HIV integration and therapeutic intervention. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2007;9:1-19.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 35.Schauer G, Leuba S, Sluis-Cremer N. Biophysical Insights into the Inhibitory Mechanism of Non-Nucleoside HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors. Biomolecules. 2013;3:889-904.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 36.Clavel F, Hance AJ. HIV drug resistance. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1023-35. [PubMed Abstract] -
- 37.Singh K, Marchand B, Kirby KA, Michailidis E, Sarafianos SG. Structural Aspects of Drug Resistance and Inhibition of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase. Viruses. 2010;2:606-638.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 38.Deeks SG, Wrin T, Liegler T, et al. Virologic and immunologic consequences of discontinuing combination antiretroviral-drug therapy in HIV-infected patients with detectable viremia. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:472-80.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 39.Craigie R. HIV integrase, a brief overview from chemistry to therapeutics. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:23213-6.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 40.Engelman A, Cherepanov P. Retroviral Integrase Structure and DNA Recombination Mechanism. Microbiol Spectr. 2014;2(6).[PubMed Abstract] -
- 41.Pommier Y, Johnson AA, Marchand C. Integrase inhibitors to treat HIV/AIDS. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4:236-48.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 42.Lataillade M, Kozal MJ. The hunt for HIV-1 integrase inhibitors. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2006;20:489-501.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 43.Grandgenett DP, Pandey KK, Bera S, Aihara H. Multifunctional facets of retrovirus integrase. World J Biol Chem. 2015;6:83-94.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 44.Ingale KB, Bhatia MS. HIV-1 integrase inhibitors: a review of their chemical development. Antivir Chem Chemother. 2011;22:95-105.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 45.Hazuda DJ. HIV integrase as a target for antiretroviral therapy. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012;7:383-9.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 46.Flexner C. HIV-protease inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1281-92.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 47.Adamson CS. Protease-Mediated Maturation of HIV: Inhibitors of Protease and the Maturation Process. Mol Biol Int. 2012;2012:604261.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 48.Briggs JA, Simon MN, Gross I, et al. The stoichiometry of Gag protein in HIV-1. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004;11:672-5.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 49.Adamson CS, Jones IM. The molecular basis of HIV capsid assembly--five years of progress. Rev Med Virol. 2004;14:107-21.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 50.Freed EO. HIV-1 assembly, release and maturation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:484-96.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 51.Aiken C, Rousso I. The HIV-1 capsid and reverse transcription. Retrovirology. 2021;18:29.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 52.Bester SM, Adu-Ampratwum D, Annamalai AS, et al. Structural and Mechanistic Bases of Viral Resistance to HIV-1 Capsid Inhibitor Lenacapavir. mBio. 2022;13:e0180422.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 53.AlBurtamani N, Paul A, Fassati A. The Role of Capsid in the Early Steps of HIV-1 Infection: New Insights into the Core of the Matter. Viruses. 2021;13:1161.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 54.Bester SM, Wei G, Zhao H, et al. Structural and mechanistic bases for a potent HIV-1 capsid inhibitor. Science. 2020;370:360-4.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 55.Gras L, Kesselring AM, Griffin JT, et al. CD4 cell counts of 800 cells/mm3 or greater after 7 years of highly active antiretroviral therapy are feasible in most patients starting with 350 cells/mm3 or greater. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;45:183-92.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 56.McFadden WM, Snyder AA, Kirby KA, et al. Rotten to the core: antivirals targeting the HIV-1 capsid core. Retrovirology. 2021;18:41.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 57.Selyutina A, Hu P, Miller S, et al. GS-CA1 and lenacapavir stabilize the HIV-1 core and modulate the core interaction with cellular factors. iScience. 2022 ;25:103593.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 58.Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Initiation of antiretroviral therapy. December 18, 2019.[HIV.gov] -
- 59.Sterling TR, Chaisson RE, Keruly J, Moore RD. Improved outcomes with earlier initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy among human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients who achieve durable virologic suppression: longer follow-up of an observational cohort study. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:1659-65. [PubMed Abstract] -
- 60.Sterne JA, May M, Costagliola D, et al. Timing of initiation of antiretroviral therapy in AIDS-free HIV-1-infected patients: a collaborative analysis of 18 HIV cohort studies. Lancet. 2009;373:1352-63.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 61.Severe P, Juste MA, Ambroise A, et al. Early versus standard antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected adults in Haiti. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:257-65.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 62.Opravil M, Ledergerber B, Furrer H, et al. Clinical efficacy of early initiation of HAART in patients with asymptomatic HIV infection and CD4 cell count > 350 x 10(6)/l. AIDS. 2002;16:1371-81. [PubMed Abstract] -
- 63.Connor EM, Sperling RS, Gelber R, et al. Reduction of maternal-infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with zidovudine treatment. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 076 Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1173-80.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 64.Rodger AJ, Cambiano V, Bruun T, et al. Risk of HIV transmission through condomless sex in serodifferent gay couples with the HIV-positive partner taking suppressive antiretroviral therapy (PARTNER): final results of a multicentre, prospective, observational study. Lancet. 2019;393:2428-38.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 65.Bavinton BR, Pinto AN, Phanuphak N, et al. Viral suppression and HIV transmission in serodiscordant male couples: an international, prospective, observational, cohort study. Lancet HIV. 2018;5:e438-e447.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 66.Gonzalo-Gil E, Ikediobi U, Sutton RE. Mechanisms of Virologic Control and Clinical Characteristics of HIV+ Elite/Viremic Controllers. Yale J Biol Med. 2017;90:245-259.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 67.Okulicz JF, Marconi VC, Landrum ML, et al. Clinical outcomes of elite controllers, viremic controllers, and long-term nonprogressors in the US Department of Defense HIV natural history study. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:1714-23.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 68.Grabar S, Selinger-Leneman H, Abgrall S, Pialoux G, Weiss L, Costagliola D. Loss of long-term non-progressor and HIV controller status over time in the French Hospital Database on HIV - ANRS CO4. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0184441.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 69.Pereyra F, Lo J, Triant VA, et al. Increased coronary atherosclerosis and immune activation in HIV-1 elite controllers. AIDS. 2012;26:2409-12.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 70.Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. What to start: initial combination regimens for people with HIV. September 12, 2024.[HIV.gov] -
- 71.Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Considerations for antiretroviral use in special patient populations: Women with HIV. September 12, 2024.[HIV.gov] -
- 72.Panel on Treatment of HIV During Pregnancy and Prevention of Perinatal Transmission. Recommendations for the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs During Pregnancy and Interventions to Reduce Perinatal HIV Transmission in the United States. Antepartum Care. Recommendations for use of antiretroviral drugs during pregnancy. Table 7. Situation-specific recommendations for use of antiretroviral drugs in pregnant people and nonpregnant people who are trying to conceive. January 31, 2024.[HIV.gov] -
- 73.Panel on Treatment of HIV During Pregnancy and Prevention of Perinatal Transmission. Recommendations for the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs During Pregnancy and Interventions to Reduce Perinatal HIV Transmission in the United States. Antepartum Care. Recommendations for use of antiretroviral drugs during pregnancy. Table 6. What to start: initial antiretroviral regimens during pregnancy for people who are antiretroviral-naive. January 31, 2024.[HIV.gov] -
- 74.Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. What to start: Table 7. Antiretroviral Regimen Considerations for Initial Therapy Based on Specific Clinical Scenarios. September 21, 2022..[HIV.gov] -
- 75.Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Laboratory testing: plasma HIV-1 RNA (viral load) and CD4 count monitoring. September 21, 2022.[HIV.gov] -
- 76.Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Laboratory testing: laboratory testing for initial assessment and monitoring of people with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy. September 21, 2022.[HIV.gov] -
- 77.Clotet B, Feinberg J, van Lunzen J, et al. Once-daily dolutegravir versus darunavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (FLAMINGO): 48 week results from the randomised open-label phase 3b study. Lancet. 2014;383:2222-31.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 78.Lennox JL, Dejesus E, Lazzarin A, et al. Safety and efficacy of raltegravir-based versus efavirenz-based combination therapy in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection: a multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9692):796-806.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 79.Kaufmann GR, Perrin L, Pantaleo G, et al. CD4 T-lymphocyte recovery in individuals with advanced HIV-1 infection receiving potent antiretroviral therapy for 4 years: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2187-95.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 80.Moore RD, Keruly JC. CD4+ cell count 6 years after commencement of highly active antiretroviral therapy in persons with sustained virologic suppression. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:441-6.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 81.Battegay M, Nüesch R, Hirschel B, Kaufmann GR. Immunological recovery and antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:280-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 82.Kelley CF, Kitchen CM, Hunt PW, Rodriguez B, Hecht FM, Kitahata M, Crane HM, Willig J, Mugavero M, Saag M, Martin JN, Deeks SG. Incomplete peripheral CD4+ cell count restoration in HIV-infected patients receiving long-term antiretroviral treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:787-94.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 83.Luz PM, Grinsztejn B, Velasque L, et al. Long-term CD4+ cell count in response to combination antiretroviral therapy. PLoS One. 2014;9:e93039.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 84.Egger M, Hirschel B, Francioli P, et al. Impact of new antiretroviral combination therapies in HIV infected patients in Switzerland: prospective multicentre study. Swiss HIV Cohort Study. BMJ. 1997;315:1194-9.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 85.Zoufaly A, an der Heiden M, Kollan C, Bogner JR, et al. Clinical outcome of HIV-infected patients with discordant virological and immunological response to antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:364-71.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 86.Karrer U, Ledergerber B, Furrer H, et al. Dose-dependent influence of didanosine on immune recovery in HIV-infected patients treated with tenofovir. AIDS. 2005;19:1987-94.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 87.Bartlett JA, Fath MJ, Demasi R, Hermes A, Quinn J, Mondou E, Rousseau F. An updated systematic overview of triple combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults. AIDS. 2006;20:2051-64. [PubMed Abstract] -
- 88.Walmsley SL, Antela A, Clumeck N, et al. Dolutegravir plus abacavir-lamivudine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1807-18.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 89.INSIGHT-ESPRIT Study Group; SILCAAT Scientific Committee, Abrams D, et al. Interleukin-2 therapy in patients with HIV infection. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1548-59.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 90.Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) Study Group, El-Sadr WM, Lundgren JD, et al. CD4+ count-guided interruption of antiretroviral treatment. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2283-96.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 91.Phillips AN, Carr A, Neuhaus J, et al. Interruption of antiretroviral therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease in persons with HIV-1 infection: exploratory analyses from the SMART trial. Antivir Ther. 2008;13:177-87.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 92.Holkmann Olsen C, Mocroft A, Kirk O, et al. Interruption of combination antiretroviral therapy and risk of clinical disease progression to AIDS or death. HIV Med. 2007;8:96-104.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 93.Kousignian I, Abgrall S, Grabar S, et al. Maintaining antiretroviral therapy reduces the risk of AIDS-defining events in patients with uncontrolled viral replication and profound immunodeficiency. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:296-304.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 94.Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Management of the treatment-experienced patient. January 20, 2022.[HIV.gov] -
Additional References
- Bell NM, Lever AM. HIV Gag polyprotein: processing and early viral particle assembly. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:136-44.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Blumenthal R, Durell S, Viard M. HIV entry and envelope glycoprotein-mediated fusion. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:40841-9.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Cahn P, Madero JS, Arribas JR, et al. Dolutegravir plus lamivudine versus dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2): week 48 results from two multicentre, double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2019;393:143-55.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Cohen CJ, Andrade-Villanueva J, et al. Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with two background nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (THRIVE): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2011;378:229-37.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Cohen CJ, Molina JM, Cahn P, et al. Efficacy and safety of rilpivirine (TMC278) versus efavirenz at 48 weeks in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: pooled results from the phase 3 double-blind randomized ECHO and THRIVE Trials. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;60:33-42.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:493-505.[PubMed Abstract] -
- De Feo CJ, Weiss CD. Escape from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) entry inhibitors. Viruses. 2012;4:3859-911.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Egger M, May M, Chêne G, et al. Prognosis of HIV-1-infected patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis of prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:119-29.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Landovitz RJ, Li S, Eron JJ Jr, et al. Tail-phase safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of long-acting injectable cabotegravir in HIV-uninfected adults: a secondary analysis of the HPTN 077 trial. Lancet HIV. 2020;7:e472-e481.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Lennox JL, Landovitz RJ, Ribaudo HJ, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of 3 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing antiretroviral regimens for treatment-naive volunteers infected with HIV-1: a randomized, controlled equivalence trial. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:461-71.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Li X, Krishnan L, Cherepanov P, Engelman A. Structural biology of retroviral DNA integration. Virology. 2011;411:194-205.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Mocroft A, Phillips AN, Gatell J, et al. Normalisation of CD4 counts in patients with HIV-1 infection and maximum virological suppression who are taking combination antiretroviral therapy: an observational cohort study. Lancet. 2007;370:407-13.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Perelson AS, Essunger P, Cao Y, et al. Decay characteristics of HIV-1 infected compartments during combination therapy. Nature. 1997;387:188-91. [PubMed Abstract] -
- Pulido F, Ribera E, Lagarde M, et al. Dual Therapy With Darunavir and Ritonavir Plus Lamivudine vs Triple Therapy With Darunavir and Ritonavir Plus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Emtricitabine or Abacavir and Lamivudine for Maintenance of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Viral Suppression: Randomized, Open-Label, Noninferiority DUAL-GESIDA 8014-RIS-EST45 Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:2112-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Raffi F, Babiker AG, Richert L, et al. Ritonavir-boosted darunavir combined with raltegravir or tenofovir-emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive adults infected with HIV-1: 96 week results from the NEAT001/ANRS143 randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014;384:1942-51.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Sluis-Cremer N, Tachedjian G. Mechanisms of inhibition of HIV replication by non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Virus Res. 2008;134:147-56.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) Study Group, Emery S, Neuhaus JA, et al. Major clinical outcomes in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive participants and in those not receiving ART at baseline in the SMART study. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:1133-44.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Tronchet JM, Seman M. Nonnucleoside inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: from the biology of reverse transcription to molecular design. Curr Top Med Chem. 2003;3:1496-511.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Zash R, Holmes L, Diseko M, et al. Neural-Tube Defects and Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:827-40.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Zash R, Makhema J, Shapiro RL. Neural-Tube Defects with Dolutegravir Treatment from the Time of Conception. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:979-81.[PubMed Abstract] -
Figures
Figure 1. HIV Life Cycle and Site of Inhibitors of Viral ReplicationIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 2 (Image Series). HIV EnvelopeIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David Spach, MDFigure 2B. gp120 and gp41Illustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David Spach, MDFigure 3. gp120 and gp41Illustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David Spach, MDFigure 4 (Image Series). HIV Tropism and Binding to Host CoreceptorsIllustration: David Spach, MDFigure 4B. X4-Tropic HIVIllustration: David Spach, MDFigure 4C. Dual-Tropic HIVIllustration: David Spach, MDFigure 4D. Mixed-Tropic HIVIllustration: David Spach, MDFigure 5 (Image Series). Mechanism of Action of Entry InhibitorsIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 5B. Mechanism of Action of CD4 Postattachment Inhibitors: IbalizumabIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 5C. Mechanism of Action of CCR5 Antagonists: MaravirocIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 5D. Mechanism of Action of Fusion Inhibitor: EnfuvirtideIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 6 (Image Series). Structure of HIV Reverse TranscriptaseIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 6B. HIV Reverse Transcriptase: p66 SubunitIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 6C. HIV Reverse Transcriptase: Active Polymerase and RNase H SitesIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 6D. HIV Reverse Transcriptase: Polymerase DomainIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 7 (Image Series). HIV Reverse TranscriptionIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 7B. HIV Reverse Transcription and Incorporation of NucleotidesIllustration: David H. Spach, MDFigure 7C. Reverse Transcription: Primer and Template StrandsIllustration: David H. Spach, MDFigure 8 (Image Series). Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: Mechanism of ActionIllustration: David H. Spach, MDFigure 8B. Incorporation of Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase InhibitorsIllustration: David H. Spach, MDFigure 8C. Primer BlockingIllustration: David H. Spach, MDFigure 8D. Chain TerminationIllustration: David H. Spach, MDFigure 9 (Image Series). Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: Mechanism of ActionIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 9B. Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor-Induced Thumb Hyperextension of Reverse TranscriptaseIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 10 (Image Series). HIV IntegraseIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 10B. HIV Integrase: Monomer, Dimer, and Tetrad FormsIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 11 (Image Series). Integration of HIV DNA into Host DNAIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 11B. HIV Integrase Strand TransferIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 11C. Unfolding of Integrated HIV DNAIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 11D. Proviral HIV DNAIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 12. Integrase Strand Transfer InhibitorIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 13 (Image Series). HIV Protease Dimer and ConfigurationsIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 13B. HIV Protease ConfigurationsIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 14. Sequential Steps in HIV Gag Protein Processing by HIV ProteaseIllustration: David H. Spach, MDFigure 15. HIV Protease InhibitorIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 16 (Image Series). HIV Core and Capsid ShellIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 16B. HIV Capsid AssemblyIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 17. Mechanism of Action of Capsid InhibitorIllustration: Cognition Studio, Inc. and David H. Spach, MDFigure 18. Median CD4 Cell Count Over Time After Starting Antiretroviral TherapySource: Gras L, Kesselring AM, Griffin JT, et al. CD4 cell counts of 800 cells/mm3 or greater after 7 years of highly active antiretroviral therapy are feasible in most patients starting with 350 cells/mm3 or greater. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;45:183-92.Figure 19 (Image Series). Clinical Trial with Interleukin-2Source: INSIGHT-ESPRIT Study Group; SILCAAT Scientific Committee, Abrams D, et al. Interleukin-2 therapy in patients with HIV infection. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1548-59.Figure 19B. Outcome of Patients in SILCATT TrialSource: INSIGHT-ESPRIT Study Group; SILCAAT Scientific Committee, Abrams D, et al. Interleukin-2 therapy in patients with HIV infection. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1548-59.Tables
Table 1. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents with HIVPanel's Recommendations for Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy in Treatment-Naive Patients
- Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is recommended for all individuals with HIV to reduce morbidity and mortality (AI) and to prevent the transmission of HIV to others (AI).
- Initiate ART immediately (or as soon as possible) after HIV diagnosis in order to increase the uptake of ART and linkage to care, decrease the time to viral suppression for individual patients, and improve the rate of virologic suppression among persons with HIV (AII).
- When initiating ART, it is important to educate patients regarding the benefits of ART and to deploy strategies to optimize care engagement and treatment adherence (AIII).
Rating of Recommendations: A = Strong; B = Moderate; C = Optional
Rating of Evidence: I = Data from randomized controlled trials; II = Data from well-designed nonrandomized trials or observational cohort studies with long-term clinical outcomes; III = Expert opinion
Source:- Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Initiation of antiretroviral therapy. December 18, 2019. [HIV.gov]
Table 2. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents with HIVRecommended Initial Regimens for Most People with HIV
Recommended regimens are those with demonstrated durable virologic efficacy, favorable tolerability and toxicity profiles, and ease of use. Choice of antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy should be guided by recommendations from the Perinatal Guidelines. For people who do NOT have a history of long-acting cabotegravir use as HIV PrEP, the following regimens are recommended: INSTI + 2 NRTIs:
- Bictegravir-tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine (AI)
- Dolutegravir plus (tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir DF)a plus (emtricitabine or lamivudine) (AI)
INSTI + 1 NRTI
- Dolutegravir-lamivudine (AI)—except for individuals with HIV RNA >500,000 copies/mL, HBV coinfection, or when antiretroviral therapy is to be started before the results of HIV genotypic resistance testing for reverse transcriptase or HBV testing are available
For people with HIV and a history of using long-acting cabotegravir as HIV PrEP, integrase genotypic drug resistance testing should be done before the start of antiretroviral therapy. If treatment is begun prior to the results of genotypic testing, the following regimen is recommended: Boosted PI + 2 NRTIs:
- Darunavir (boosted with cobicistat or ritonavir) plus (tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir DF)a plus (emtricitabine or lamivudine)—pending the results of the genotype test (AIII).
Abbreviations: INSTI = integrase strand transfer inhibitor; NRTI = nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor
aTenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir DF are two forms of tenofovir approved by the FDA. Tenofovir alafenamide has fewer bone and kidney toxicities than tenofovir DF, whereas tenofovir DF is associated with lower lipid levels. Safety, cost, and access are among the factors to consider when choosing between these drugs.Rating of Recommendations: A = Strong; B = Moderate; C = Weak
Rating of Evidence: I = Data from randomized controlled trials; II = Data from well-designed nonrandomized trials, observational cohort studies with long-term clinical outcomes, relative bioavailability/bioequivalence studies, or regimen comparisons from randomized switch studies; III = Expert opinionSource:- Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. What to start: initial combination regimens for people with HIV. September 12, 2024. [HIV.gov]
Table 3. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents with HIVOther Initial Antiretroviral Regimens for Certain Clinical Scenarios
Several antiretroviral regimens are found to be effective and tolerable as initial regimens but have some disadvantages or have fewer supporting data from randomized clinical trials compared with the recommended regimens. However, one of these regimens may be preferred for an individual with HIV in certain clinical situations. INSTIs + 2 NRTIs:
- Dolutegravir-abacavir-lamivudine (BI)—if HLA-B*5701 negative and without chronic HBV coinfection
Boosted PI plus 2 NRTIs: - Darunavir-cobicistata plus (tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir DF)b plus (emtricitabine or lamivudine) (BI)
- Darunavir plus ritonavir plus (tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir DF)b plus (emtricitabine or lamivudine) (BI)
- Darunavir-cobicistata plus abacavir-lamivudine—if HLA-B*5701 negative (BII)
- Darunavir plus ritonavir plus abacavir-lamivudine—if HLA-B*5701 negative (BII)
NNRTI + 2 NRTIs: - Doravirine-tenofovir DFb-lamivudine (BI)
- Doravirine plus tenofovir alafenamideb-emtricitabine (BIII)
- Rilpivirine-tenofovir alafenamideb-emtricitabine (BII)—if HIV RNA <100,000 copies/mL and CD4 count >200 cells/mm3
Regimens to Abbreviations: INSTI = integrase strand transfer inhibitor; NRTI = nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; PI = protease inhibitor; NNRTI = nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor;
aCobicistat should be avoided during pregnancy because lower concentrations of cobicistat and darunavir have been observed during the second and third trimesters. For further information, refer to the Perinatal Guidelines.
bTenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir DF are two forms of tenofovir approved by the FDA. Tenofovir alafenamide has fewer bone and kidney toxicities than tenofovir DF, while tenofovir DF is associated with lower lipid levels. Safety, cost, and access are among the factors to consider when choosing between these drugs.Rating of Recommendations: A = Strong; B = Moderate; C = Weak
Rating of Evidence: I = Data from randomized controlled trials; II = Data from well-designed nonrandomized trials, observational cohort studies with long-term clinical outcomes, relative bioavailability/bioequivalence studies, or regimen comparisons from randomized switch studies; III = Expert opinionSource:- Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. What to start: initial combination regimens for people with HIV. September 12, 2024. [HIV.gov]
Share by e-mail
Check
-On-
Learning
QuestionsThe Check-on-Learning Questions are short and topic related. They are meant to help you stay on track throughout each lesson and check your understanding of key concepts.You must be signed in to customize your interaction with these questions.
- 0%Lesson 2
Since you've received 80% or better on this quiz, you may claim continuing education credit.
You seem to have a popup blocker enabled. If you want to skip this dialog please Always allow popup windows for the online course.